Continuing to focus on how the current charter with items that
might warrant consideration by the new commission, and what the last charter
review determined. To view the entire current city charter go to: https://www.ci.pomona.ca.us/mm/cityhall/pdf/city_charter.pdf
ARTICLE VI – City Manager
This is the part of the charter
that deals with the city manager, how they’re chosen, and what their duties are
among others. There were no recommendations in 2010 for this entire article.
Section 601 deals with the
office and the appointment to the office. There are 5 lettered paragraphs in
this section. a) states that the city manager shall be the chief administrative
officer of the city (no, this is not the mayor), b) goes into how the position
is appointed, that their term is indefinite and that the sole criteria is
executive and administrative qualifications, c) states that the City Manager shall have compensation
set by the city council and shall devote full time to City Manager duties, d) this one
deserves to be quoted exactly
“Separation of Powers. Except as otherwise provided in this Charter, neither the Council nor any of its members shall interfere with the execution of the City Manager's powers and duties. The Council and its members shall deal with the administrative service under the City Manager solely through the City Manager. Councilmembers may make inquiries or discuss matters with subordinates of the City Manager; however, no Councilmember may direct staff in matters relating to setting or changing City policy”,e) states that the city manager may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the city council.
Section 602 just states that no
person who has within the past three years sat on the city council may be
considered for the position of city manager. Section 603 is another long
section which delineates the duties of the city manager, with Section 604
stating, “At least annually the City Manager's performance shall be reviewed by
the Council.” Note that there is nothing here about an outside review process
or delaying review of the city manager. It clearly states that THE COUNCIL
SHALL do a review, AT LEAST annually. (emphasis mine). The final section, 605
covers a temporary city manager in the advent that the city manager cannot
perform their duties for any reason.
ARTICLE V – Other Officers, Departments and Employees and General Provisions
This article covers the organization of the city with specific
sections on: City Clerk, City Attorney, City Treasurer, Department and Director
of Finance, Police Department and Chief, Additional Departments, and other
sections on the duties of city staff.
This is one of those areas where, unfortunately, the city is
out of compliance with our own city charter. Section 701 clearly states:
Sec. 701. Administrative
Organization.
The Council may establish City
departments, offices or agencies in addition to those created by this Charter
and may prescribe their functions except that no function assigned by
this Charter to a particular department, office or agency may be discontinued
or, unless this Charter specifically so provides, assigned to any other.
The Council shall encourage that officers, deputies, and employees of the City be
or become residents of the City.
There shall be an office of City
Clerk, City Attorney, City Treasurer, Director of Finance, and
Chief of Police. (emphasis added).
The reason that I suggest that we're out of compliance with our charter is that, I believe, currently the same person is both finance director and city treasurer. While I understand that combining these roles was done for sound fiscal reasons, this is specifically prohibited by the charter since both City Treasurer and Director of Finance are stated as offices in the charter that the city SHALL have.
The next several sections go over subjects related to departments and policies such as: appointment of department heads, nepotism, administering oaths, retirement system, political activity, oath of office, and nondiscrimination. There is also a list of things that are prohibited for city employees including: lying, bribing, or political fundraising. Anyone convicted of such offenses shall forfeit their position and not be allowed to hold any position with the city for five years.
The last charter review had no recommended changes in any of these areas.
The next several sections go over subjects related to departments and policies such as: appointment of department heads, nepotism, administering oaths, retirement system, political activity, oath of office, and nondiscrimination. There is also a list of things that are prohibited for city employees including: lying, bribing, or political fundraising. Anyone convicted of such offenses shall forfeit their position and not be allowed to hold any position with the city for five years.
The last charter review had no recommended changes in any of these areas.
NEXT TIME:
Article VIII. Appointive Boards and
Commissions and Article IX. Elections
1 comment:
The explanation we were given when "combining" offices of City Treasure and another, was that we were not in violation because we were not actually combining them. Those specific job titles and duties remained in place. At the time, the City Manager was also the City Treasurer. We were just appointing the same person to both positions.
Post a Comment